Looking at new scopes for my new competition rifle and am looking at the Nightforce atacr 5-25-56
and the vortex razor hd gen II 4.5-27-56. what are ya'lls likes, dislikes, opinions and ext?
Printable View
Looking at new scopes for my new competition rifle and am looking at the Nightforce atacr 5-25-56
and the vortex razor hd gen II 4.5-27-56. what are ya'lls likes, dislikes, opinions and ext?
Both have well-rounded feature sets, and are regarded as very good.
I have a few ATACRs, and am very pleased with them.
A lot of the folks I've known decide based on the reticle they most prefer.
I looked at both of these options and chose the vortex amg due to weight and I like the reticle.
Two different scopes for generally two different purposes. Smaller eye box FFP scope with 1-8x is more of a DMR scope and at 2.5x the cost. Large eye box SFP Scope with 1-6x is more of a close range that CAN be pushed out to longer range scope. Choose the one thats most applicable to you.
I prefer the Mil-R reticle to all others so I’d pick the NF. I would also like to give the MIL-C a whirl. It looks like a good option in the 5-25
Hmm...
I’m in love with Horus reticles.
Are you guys set up to use/implement Horus reticles?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Another vote for Mil-R reticle!
i like the contrast better on the ATACR. I think the FOV is larger on the Razor, reticle goes to the razor to me, turrets are a wash. weight sucks on both but the NF is lighter. Can't go wrong with either but the NF is going to cost more any way you look at it.
Here is a review of several high end scopes ... Tangent Theta, Minox, Rzr G2, ATACR, S&B ... influenced my decision ...
https://forum.snipershide.com/thread...-5-27.6828806/
It was between the 4-16 atacr and the 3-18 gen2 razor for me.After looking at all the features between the 2 I saw that eurooptic is blowing the 3-18 razors out for 1450 and snagged one of those.The atacr will be lighter but at the cost of 1k more I couldn't justify it.You really wont go wrong with either of them