Gotcha. Seems like that would put a 1.93 in the bottom meat of the optic, and thus be impossible to shoot irons. (Just eyeballing... could be wrong)
Printable View
Gotcha. Seems like that would put a 1.93 in the bottom meat of the optic, and thus be impossible to shoot irons. (Just eyeballing... could be wrong)
Why would you hurt my wallet like that?
Yeah, I’ve arrived there in a practical sense, but there’s a thought inside my head that says “sure would be nice to have BUIS on top of that gun, wouldn’t it?”.
When I get old, I’m going to go on rants about how back in my day dots ate batteries, and we had BUIS on our rifles, but the gottdarned Whigs ruined it for everyone, and now every other commercial on the TV is about tolerance of LPVO+, and I bet you whippersnappers don’t even have bayonets!
The Scalarworks 1.93" irons haven't been released, AFAIK, even though they've been announced for awhile.
You could always just use offset sights with 1.93". Or just accept you're not getting co-witnessing, and will need to ditch your optic to use them.
I went from lower 1/3rd to 1.93" to 2.26" for my RDS/HWS height. All have worked just fine slick, but the 1.93" made passive aiming under NODs or use with a pro mask way easier, and the 2.26" made passive aiming under NODs with a pro mask far more comfortable.