Counter sue their asses for lawyer fees, lost wages and mental trauma.
Printable View
Counter sue their asses for lawyer fees, lost wages and mental trauma.
Yeah the temporary injunction doesn't make them go back to work at the whining hospital, it just prevents them from starting at the new place until the case is heard.
"Poaching" employees isn't anything new, but has usually been associated with non-medical fields. Now it has crossed over and someone doesn't like it. Oh well.
One would think that the new hospital might provide some legal aid but they are probably washing their hands of it as that could get costly.
Or take this to the next logical conclusion, both hospitals were in on it. They agreed to this plan of action to set a precedent of one hospital not being able to hire another hospitals employees, because their is such a shortage of staff, and not just in hospitals but in every business right now. That they set this up, to basically enslave hospital staff. After what we have witnessed hospitals do over the last two years, the horrific atrocities they have committed in the name of “covid” it is not a hard jump for me to think they would pull something like this on their workers.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
how the fk can this happen?
I'd call in sick.
ETA: FOREVER!
Based on the details so far(and those seem consistent from source to source) that a US judge approached with "they won't work for us for what we want to pay so we don't want them working any where" didn't at least respond with "GTFO here" seems to be an indicator of a very deep rooted problem.
It's only poaching if there is an employment contract, otherwise these are free agents / free citizens and this is 100% BS. Hospital A is simply trying to keep costs low, they could have retained these employees by matching offers, other incentives, etc. Instead they decided to not be competitive...BUT....they have money for lawyers.
If they get away with this, teachers and first responders will be the next ones to be declared "essential workers" and lose their rights.
I could look at what the judge did and see it in the light of “Will the adults in the room please keep patient care going and figure something out..” and if they don’t he’ll have to rule against hospital A, or at least make the eventual loss so damaging that senior management at Hospital A culls the idiots behind this.
Everyone in that market has to be looking at Hospital A and wondering WTF.