Were they though? I wasn’t around during that time but it doesn’t seem like many people have them now, and I doubt they would’ve just disappeared.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Printable View
Yes. Decades ago. That was the norm. The trend has gone from that to wanting a SC carry gun, compact gun, full sized or some variant service pistol / game gun/ suppressor host/ RDS capable all compare with the same magazines, and throw in a PDW/braced pistol/carbine taking the same magazines
I was out at the range today with Michael shooting video for Custom Smith Mfg. He has more stock and brace options coming for the B&Ts. Video is up on the Facebook page now. Good stuff.
Delete.
Delete.
I plan to stick with the APC mags, primarily due to having a good supply. I snatched most of them up secondhand (discounted) and most were lightly/barely/unused. For my purposes, which are purely recreational, the B&T mags have worked without issue and I prefer the way they look. The optional pistol mag lowers look weird to me, but I understand the value they have to others. I have seen instances, shared by others, of base plate failures, though. I can’t recall specifically, but it was most likely full or partially full mags dropped on concrete. Perhaps, Magpul will get bored someday and develop an APC magazine.
Right now, I would make one in Glock for le/civy and mil. 320 if army going to buy. And consider 92 if any big legacy market buyers. I would make my own glock or whatever compatible 40 round banana clipz, not a proprietary mag. It is a factor that increases sales. Just as if I made a 5.56 carbine it would be AR magwell compatible. And a 7.62x39 carbine would be AK mag compatible.
Delete.
Buying 350 guns is a far cry from adoption