They're useful for dryfire practice, that's about it IMHO.
Printable View
They're useful for dryfire practice, that's about it IMHO.
This is would be hysterically funny, if it were not so sad.
Prestonshooting is a troll account for Reverend Paul McCain, a troublemaking whiner who has been banned here more times than anyone in the history of M4C. Let that sink in.
So a never been there, can't do that person is presuming to lecture a US Army Ranger with multiple combat deployments on how to win gunfights. Gotcha.
Paul, do you have any idea of the frequency and intensity of the combat the Ranger Regiment has engaged in over the last 18 years? If you did, you would drop to a knee and thank God that our nation has produced such men.
And just for your general font of knowledge, it's totally possible to use your sights and get hits in a gunfight. In the words of Ron White "I know, I've seen me do it."
The amount of derpitude in your posts in truly mind-boggling. You have no shame, no honor, and no respect for our country's warriors - both military and LEO. I would be delighted to personally introduce you to some of them.
Lasers are an excellent tool. I won’t carry a J frame without one and my beside the bed gun. Took some night training in shoot houses a few years back with Vickie’s and Hackathorn and quickly learned that lasers are a Godsend when the lights get low.
Good input, makes me wonder if it's better to 'adapt' and train for the changed vision versus getting another 'tool' like a laser that has downsides too, like having to be activated, running out of battery, limited visibility at distance. That's worth thinking through.
Yes of the ones I tried at range, CT seemed the best overall, they were easiest for me to activate and visibility was good.
Also I see on Vicker's night sights page he endorses CT specifically, good to know.