Ruger LCP vs. Smith J-Frame: Pros & Cons?
This thread assumes you have or have had both and in trouble-free incarnations.
I've been a Smith 642 fanboy for years, but recently I picked up a totally reliable Ruger LCP and I'm rethinking which one I want for EDC.
Some comparison points:
1. Although the LCP holds potentially slightly more rounds, and can be reloaded more quickly, the 642 should last longer and be able to handle hotter ammo.
2. The sights on both suck, so this is of no consequence.
3. The LCP is small enough to fit in a pocket, but there are plenty of concealment holsters for both, so this shouldn't be a concern.
4. The Smith has a metal frame, the LCP has a polymer frame. The LCP has a noticeable and slightly uncomfortable recoil
5. The LCP is flatter, making it less likely to print.
Those of you who own both, which do you prefer AND WHY?