Printable View
That would make it subsonic at 1K yards...so in other words, not a 1K capable rifle (regardless of Chandler's claims). It would also give it 60+ inches more drop at 1K yards than a M40.
The Marines make their own M40's for the most part, if they wanted an 18" rifle why wouldn't they just make it in house? The $10K price tag leaves me feeling like this was a good 'ol boy transaction.
This was made for DARPA. Who seems to be doing research on what the armed forces might need in the future. This request was obviously geared towards research for a lighter and shorter package for the Marine snipers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Trim2L
The $10k pricetag most likely represents a price that includes allowable, and allocable things, like G&A, overhead, profit, etc. Same as with all gov't contracts.Quote:
The $10K price tag leaves me feeling like this was a good 'ol boy transaction.
This is what I thought was interesting....why limit yourself to being subsonic @ 1k?Quote:
Originally Posted by Trim2L
Quote:
It's not a maritime op- they are shooting floating targets.
Semantics I think, shooting on/around ocean winds...is what I was inferring
It almost works as well as the ACU.Quote:
Originally Posted by Impact
SnipersHide has a really good discussion about how much of a rip off this is.
Plenty of info about it on the hide.
Interesting last January (I think it was Jan) I was chrono'ing my 700P (cut to 20") w/AAC Cyclone and was getting 2550fps with 175gr Black Hills red box.Quote:
Originally Posted by SHIVAN
I've thought of shortening it even further like 16.5" for a 500yd and shorter gun since I never shoot it past that anyway.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Littlelebowski
Thanks for that link! Lotsa good info.
Sounds right to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by gotm4