That explains why I had such a hard time trying to stake my old LWRC carrier key lol.:suicide2:
Printable View
Honestly, this reminds me of the old-school Adams Arms piston conversion kit.
Looks like Colt went cheap with the carrier.
... and what's up with that barrel profile? Why does it need an M203 notch if you can't remove the bottom rail to install that style of M203 mount?
From the pix it looks like the bottom section can be removed independantly.
I'm too old to start fooling with new fangled doo-dads. I'll stick with my 6920.
:big_boss:
I do not argue your POV at all, but I can see that there is some kind of adhesive here and my guess is that it isn't going any where without a blow torch.
No on the adjustable gas setting, but I believe they did it on the one they submitted to the .Mil testing.
C4
I couldn't agree more...Like it or not I think the piston is going to continue to evolve till the mil accepts one and makes a mil-spec standard for its materials, design, manufacturing, etc. I think some day probably 40 years down the road :) it will be completely perfected just like the DI system.
Until that point, I look forward to the continued pissing matches on here regarding the two systems.
BTW, any idea what the price will be? I'm looking to step into a tier platform...and I'd like to buy one from you :)