For those of you who have had your weapons cerakoted, is the coating that much better for rust and corrosion prevention than standard Mil-Spec Type III anodizing? Or is it mainly cosmetic?
Printable View
For those of you who have had your weapons cerakoted, is the coating that much better for rust and corrosion prevention than standard Mil-Spec Type III anodizing? Or is it mainly cosmetic?
I like it because you can get a different color. It also adds extra protection.
Now that receivers are avaliable in anodized black, tan, and OD, and soon to be multicam, I see no reason to own a gun that is painted
[QUOTE=scottryan;1360036]Now that receivers are avaliable in anodized black, tan, and OD, and soon to be multicam, I see no reason to own a gun that is painted[/QUOTE
+1 I agree, type III penetrates into the base metal and is very durable.
When anondizing the color varies form batch to batch. Thats why most companies still dont do it.