Does anyone actually use their SBR for regular home defense?
Does anyone actually use their SBR for regular home defense?
The reason I ask is I would hate to have a $3,000 SBR be taken away into evidence, abused by the collecting officer/lab tester and then sit in a locker for months to years as the trial progresses. I love the idea of using a 9” 300 blackout with a suppressor for home defense, but leaning towards using my 16” unsuppressed or 12 gauge/handgun for home defense.
Replacing a $600.00 handgun or shotgun is easier to stomach than waiting another 6+ months to get another SBR stamp.
Thoughts?
To use or not to use...that is the question
Although mine is not an SBR I wanted to chime in as I am in the unusual position of being a Federal LEO but living in NY City.
The general consensus among Fed/State/Local law enforcement here is, basically, "anything short of a post-Katrina/LA riot-type of "wild west" lawlessness should not require that an AR be used for self defense".
I will refrain from telling you my opinion of this but will say that my AR is always within reach while I am home...
After the recent hurricane (Sandy), we had some "fine, upstanding" members of the Staten Island community that felt it was a good time to try to rob homes as the power was out and cell phone service was nearly non-existant. There were a number of LEO's that I am aware of who live in the area with their ARs ready to go so I assume I am not in the minority.
Does anyone actually use their SBR for regular home defense?
Yes. I would also beat a mother ****er to death with a solid gold brick if they broke into my house.
Re: Does anyone actually use their SBR for regular home defense?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Inkslinger
Yes. I would also beat a mother ****er to death with a solid gold brick if they broke into my house.
Now that's class...
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2