Call and request a copy of the comprehensive test and evaluation report. File a public records request if necessary. Note what response you receive, or lack thereof.
Printable View
Call and request a copy of the comprehensive test and evaluation report. File a public records request if necessary. Note what response you receive, or lack thereof.
Cory, I know quite a few of the guys on that team and from what I know the chief had nothing to do with the decision. It cam down to the team and the officer in charge of the firearms program that made the decision.
Here's what I don't quite grasp. Why would the LWRC be a good choice for SWAT and not for patrol and vice versa? Are there profound differences between the set ups?
Why would you try and support two different systems that both do the same thing? Maybe I am missing something here.
Separate budget allotments maybe?
Where I work it's a separate budget and separate testing and evaluation issue. SWAT buys what it wants based on senior SWAT leadership decisions from the SWAT budget and patrol gets what the training academy/Chief wants from the general fund/federal grant money. This is why I have a city issued M&P .40 and City issued Springfield Operator.
LWRCs might be in 6.8? 1/7 twist on lwrci and 1/9 twist on rugers, Maybe seperate bullet weights?