Aimpoint Comp M4s questions

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ridgerunner665

I think I might go with the M4 (no S)...The way the S interferes with the magnifier mount kinda sucks...I really like the uncluttered look of the S model, though.

Decisions, decisions...

And I answered my own question about if/how all that would fit on the rail...

Can the magnifier mount be flipped around and mounted the other way...so the magnifier can be snugged up against the RDS?

And are there any issues with doing so?

---

I had a compm4s in combination with an aimpoint 3x. Both in larue mounts--the one that flips to the side for the 3x. I still have the m4s and larue mount but sold the 3x and mount. I would go with the larue mounts (or adm), although I'm not a huge fan of larue mounts. iIRC, Both make mounts for the m4s and 3x.

There was some crowding but the only issue was that I couldn't close the lens cover on the rear of the m4s. Ultimately, I just took the lens covers off. They weren't needed.

I've read everything I could find on this...but I'm still a little confused.

I wear glasses (nearsighted with astigmatism)...and I'm 40 (some age related issues focusing on things close up)...my glasses are not bi-focals.

Will this be an issue with the Aimpoint?

I have used red dots in the past...on a crossbow...and don't recall it being a problem. Also, the Sig has a red dot on it now, it came with it, the original Sig red dot (4moa). I have noticed the dot is a little "bloomy", but not too bad...I figured it was the low budget optic.

I also have trouble focusing on a plain reticle if the scope doesn't have about 4" of eye relief...getting old sucks...there was a time when I could shoot with the best of them. :mad:

I have the comp M4s on a 14.5" M4 that get run hard all around. I love it. I was shooting beside our sniper team and piggy backing on their targets out to 300. At 200 I was able to dial the brightness down and have facial hits on a life-size face target without a magnifier. At 300 it was on the 8 1/8" X 11" paper we printed the target on but couldn't hold an adequate group.

Eye relief should be no problem at all. I have moved it all over the rail and it makes no difference.

I shot a PRO also. Very good sight for the money. Only miniscule downfall is the type of battery and reduced battery life. If you arent beating the he!! out of it like I do at work, I go for the PRO and save the $200.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TactTeam

I have the comp M4s on a 14.5" M4 that get run hard all around. I love it. I was shooting beside our sniper team and piggy backing on their targets out to 300. At 200 I was able to dial the brightness down and have facial hits on a life-size face target without a magnifier. At 300 it was on the 8 1/8" X 11" paper we printed the target on but couldn't hold an adequate group.

Eye relief should be no problem at all. I have moved it all over the rail and it makes no difference.

I shot a PRO also. Very good sight for the money. Only miniscule downfall is the type of battery and reduced battery life. If you arent beating the he!! out of it like I do at work, I go for the PRO and save the $200.

---

I appreciate the info...

I want something that can get the hell beat out of it and still work...same goes for the waterproofing...I don't expect to be 150 feet under (and if I am, the RDS is the least of my worries), but the extra insurance never hurts.

I hope I never need any of it for anything serious...but if i do, I don't wanna to find myself saying, "I should have gotten the M4"....because it will be getting wet, crossing rivers on horseback mostly...I'm not trying to spec a prom queen rifle ;)

It will live a hard life, well cared for...but a hard life.

Why a piston? Vickers gave 4 reasons why one might actually need a piston AR...reason #4 pertains to me, in addition to the water mentioned above...and I got it at a good price.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ridgerunner665

I've read everything I could find on this...but I'm still a little confused.

I wear glasses (nearsighted with astigmatism)...and I'm 40 (some age related issues focusing on things close up)...my glasses are not bi-focals.

Will this be an issue with the Aimpoint?

I have used red dots in the past...on a crossbow...and don't recall it being a problem. Also, the Sig has a red dot on it now, it came with it, the original Sig red dot (4moa). I have noticed the dot is a little "bloomy", but not too bad...I figured it was the low budget optic.

I also have trouble focusing on a plain reticle if the scope doesn't have about 4" of eye relief...getting old sucks...there was a time when I could shoot with the best of them. :mad:

---

If the sig isn't much of a problem, then a 2 moa aimpoint m4 should be fine. Same age but my eye issues are just the opposite. I think the m4s is slightly more crisp than my T1 2moa but not enough to make any real difference.
I have heard a few old timers like us (actually older) say the m4 worked when the micros didn't. I have no idea how that happens but they swear it does. I have never experienced it.
I suspect if you have a problem with an m4 or m4s then you probably are out of luck with rds.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hjmpanzr

If the sig isn't much of a problem, then a 2 moa aimpoint m4 should be fine. Same age but my eye issues are just the opposite. I think the m4s is slightly more crisp than my T1 2moa but not enough to make any real difference.
I have heard a few old timers like us (actually older) say the m4 worked when the micros didn't. I have no idea how that happens but they swear it does. I have never experienced it.
I suspect if you have a problem with an m4 or m4s then you probably are out of luck with rds.

---

I'm gonna get one and try it, I don't know of anywhere local that I can try before I buy...I'm gonna look around for the best deal with a return policy I guess...Midway, maybe Cabelas...or Grant (not sure what his policy is)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by VIP3R 237

I have had both and unless you are set on the AA battery of the M4S I don't see why you wouldn't buy the Pro for nearly half the cost. It will do almost everything the M4S will, just with a shorter battery life.

---

I have both and agree wih this. If cost isn't a factor M4 is superior. If you go M4 get the high battery mount. Easier to manipulate the control knob with gloves on or with a magnifier behind it.

Sorry, accidental double post.

If you can wait until Black Friday, you can find an M4/M4s for less than $600. I've seen the Pro for less than $400 which includes a decent mount. Its hard not to buy that for such a good price, I got one of my mom's 20 year old Colt AR-15 and it rejuvenated that gun like nothing else.

Damn this is getting expensive...at least for an old gearjammer like me.

$800+ for the Aimpoint (the optic plus flip covers)
$550+ for the magnifier (I am gonna wait on this, may not need it...)
$200+ for Troy BUIS
$135+ if I need/want a Larue mount
$300 I've already spent on mags
And my remaining arm and leg for a shitload of ammo.

Counting the cost of the rifle...thats darn near $3,000!

Ahh hell...if ya wanna play ya gotta pay I reckon. :jester: