The sporter clause is a clear 2nd Amendment violation just waiting for someone with the balls to file a lawsuit and challenge it.
Look at it's title ... "sporter"
The 2nd Amendment says not one thing about rifles for sporting purposes.
It's sole intention was to ensure armament, any armament by the way, of the populace against governmental overreach.
The thought of citizens having rifles for the purpose of hunting and defense was a given.
The purpose of the 2nd Amendment was not sporting, defense or hunting.
It was armed resistance plain and simple.
If the tenacity exists to defy the political shitstorm and get it to this Supreme Court the legal argument for revocation or modification will be compelling.
Just need a few good lawyers.

