http://i.imgur.com/Yfc14LLl.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Xunu5Ihl.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/BeDKepcl.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/AGrwSgil.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/JTYdtL3l.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/t4WvEHOl.jpg
More gun (stock) porn for my friends at M4C :moil:
Printable View
http://i.imgur.com/Yfc14LLl.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Xunu5Ihl.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/BeDKepcl.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/AGrwSgil.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/JTYdtL3l.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/t4WvEHOl.jpg
More gun (stock) porn for my friends at M4C :moil:
Nice!
Damnnnnitttt!!
This pics ain't helping my unfortunate lack of patience!
I really want the FDE stock...but I might have to cave, since I can't imagine waiting til December!
I'm a huge BCM fan, but I will say from a pure aesthetics standpoint the MagPul looks better. I'm looking forward to seeing the two reviewed side by side.
I read something where they said the stock was modular and could have interchangeable pieces in the future. Exactly what features of the stock will we be able to change?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The BCM and the SL feel and look very similar to me. I like the sling attachment locations better on the SL. The BCM is limited on the QD positioning by the plastic. The BCM is easier to adjust IMO. They both lockup tight (no rattle at all for either), but the SL is very tight (too tight for my taste). I don't like the adjustment on the side of the SL, it feels awkward to get to (not as natural as just grabbing the stock and moving it).
I said I was going to wait but I'm ordering one next time in stock.
ThisQuote:
It will be interesting to compare it to the MagPul SL stock, which I feel will be it's direct competition.
Plouf, I know you just got your hands on the new Magpul MOE SL too, would it be possible to compare and contrast the two? Absolutely love your vids BTW.
I believe an important part of the "rugged" discussion is who releases drop test info. BCM claims it exceeds the mil spec, and uses it as marketing material.
Exceeding the mil spec is a good trait, but it doesn't mean that other stocks don't also do the same. Comparable data is necessary before saying it is "one of the strongest" stocks. A better description, at this point, is that it "exceeds mil spec drop test requirements."
Drop test Schmop test. I break almost everything I touch, and I've never cracked a stock.
If a guy mortars on the toe of the stock, he's retarded and can't be helped no matter what. I'm sure the gunfighter stock is very stout, but that's a lower priority characteristic to me.