Are we in the era of $350-$550 stocks?
Is the market accepting the concept of an AR with a half to a third of the rifle's value is in the stock? Is this more of the Instagram fetishism that boosted sales of tricked out $2500 Glocks or are we seeing a benefit to impeccably machined and engineered buttstocks with poor to minimal cheekweld?
I just got a Ranier Arms email for the Fortis stock, priced at $325 (reg. price supposedly $400).
https://www.rainierarms.com/fortis-l...t=New+Products
Also on the market are the Maxim Defense stocks ranging from $400 to $550
https://www.maximdefense.com/product...attern-stocks/
Strike Industries also just announced a PDW stock for a modest $250.
https://www.rainierarms.com/strike-i...page-category2
Also the MVB CQB stock comes in at $350-$400
https://mvbindustries.com/product/arc-stock-multi-pos/
Are we in the era of $350-$550 stocks?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Mysteryman
A low quality scope mount affects downrange performance. A good trigger also affects downrange performance. A stock is a stock, if it's solid it will do the job. But as you said, there are other over priced parts/accessories so there's no reason over priced stocks can't have a place.
MM
Yeah, sure, low quality scope mounts do affect performance. There are quality scope mounts for less than $400.
A good trigger does not change the guns mechanical accuracy rather helps the shooter achieve accuracy.
99% of shooters are probably better served spending the $1200 he could have in trigger, scope mount, and stock and putting it toward ammo and training. ;)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk