Which optic is their choice?
Printable View
Read the " Irons and Optics " article written by Paul Howe. I respect his opinion. I was a bit surprised to read that he is a fan of the Burris 3x.
http://www.combatshootingandtactics.com/published.htm
The Americans issue the ACOG (and Aimpoint), the Russians issue a 2.8x, tritium prism optic, the Chinese issue a prism optic. Even for serving soldiers these countries feel the prism with its simplicity is the way to go. If prism optics were free, everyone would have an ACOG. Assuming price constraints, we are down to Burris and Primary Arms. The PA 2.5X is zeroed at 50 yards and it is said they are good to 250 yards. The reticle on the 2.5X PA looks very good to me, in fact there is talk of an ACOG with this reticle. So what is wrong with the 2.5x PA? I am not saying there is anything wrong with the 3X, either PA or Burris. But in my forested world, I'm just not going out to 300 yards because of visibility problems and the 2.5x reticle looks much quicker at short distances. Look guys, I'm a relative novice here, so please tell me where I am going wrong.