So can we get someone in the Senate to add repeal of 925(d)(3), 922(r), and 922(o) to the senate version?
So can we get someone in the Senate to add repeal of 925(d)(3), 922(r), and 922(o) to the senate version?
Ugh. Lots of lose in that sentence.Quote:
Statistically, your girlfriends daughter is going to be one of them.
Polymer 80%'s stacked deep and a cordless drill FTW... only thing better would be having the molds and machinery to start from raw plastigoop.
Which reminds me, I better get a zillion more plastics and several cases of Pmags ordered as a personal "F*CK YOU" to our local gun-grabbers...
You're joking, right? The FBI will never investigate and prosecute people for lying on a 4473, unless they go on to commit a mass murder. In most of those cases they still won't. Ever. Not even with 10 days to respond to a NICS check. Not even if they got total gun registration!
Right now the RINO's who voted for this BS are saying they won a concession, because they slipped in ICE notification on illegals. IDIOTS! ICE doesn't give a damn if some illegal tries to buy a gun! They will not investigate a single one of those attempts, unless the illegal goes on to make national news with a crime after the fact. Even then they won't prosecute for that particular crime. The RINO's won NOTHING!
The system is not designed nor intended to prevent crimes. The new laws won't and neither will the laws they demand when these don't work. As a matter of fact, the only gun law that WOULD prevent crime, is if you made it a felony for the FBI to not investigate and upon evidence of a felony, arrest and prosecute the offender. Make it a felony for the U.S. Attorney's office to decline prosecuting what is essentially a slam dunk case, when a prohibited person lies on a 4473. Make them subject to a local Grand Jury prosecution and you'd suddenly see a whole lot of prosecutions for the crime. Right now there are almost none, anywhere in the U.S.
As long as the government has blanket immunity from not enforcing the law as written, the only people who will pay are the poor schleps they decide to target for selective prosecution. That's exactly how it's been for decades now. :(
Eventually leads to violence against gun owners, which begets civil war II.
Unfortunately, it is inevitable at this point.
Just being on civil war two now.
I’m an old has been.
Pushing 30 years with the wife and it’s not like our 60th anniversary and ages 85 to 95 are going to be the greatest ten years of our life.
Kids are grown.
I need reading glasses, red dot sights look like a figure of eight, or a dick mod hole.
I have to adjust the focus on scopes.
When I run it looks like the six million dollar man but I’m going 6mph instead of 60.
If I do a max set on bench with what used to be an early warmup weight without feeling like I was stabbed with platypus poison while being bitten by a pit bull it’s a good workout.
I have one hole left in my IWB belt, when I’m not carrying.
Get this shit on now or I won’t be good for much.
Call me evil, but if I had the Thanos glove I really would snap my fingers.
But instead of a 50% cut at random of humans on earth, the 50% least resilient, non productive, least potentional, gun grabbing, ain’t fun, near term abortion by transsexual pegging supporters, pro increased taxes, anti freedom types would be gone.
And I would F with the laws of physics to ensure limited camera resolution, recording quality, processing speed, and data storage to the levels of 1968. I could live without what we have now in exchange for not being tracked and recorded and data collected registered every second of every day. I’d get by with BSing this same stuff with a handful of guys around a drink strewn table in a smoky VFW hall, with a box of 8 tracks in the car, a set of encyclopedias at home, and hitting the pay phone to check on the wife before going home to three channels.