It's a classic. They just didn't have the uber high quality CGI we have today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElzIPn1pXWE
Printable View
It's a classic. They just didn't have the uber high quality CGI we have today:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ElzIPn1pXWE
Solid 'C'. I loved the opening scene, I loved how they treated Apollo 1, but otherwise it it showed Neil Armstrong as a moody, sullen, cranky guy. Several people have come out and said that it did not accurately portray how he really was. Also, it took some historical liberties to make the story a little better like when he threw his daughter's bracelet in the crater.
I love The Right Stuff, Apollo 13, From the Earth to the Moon.... This one just didn't do it for me.
The character was based on a book from someone who knew and interviewed Armstrong and wife wife for decades apparently. No idea if that was an accurate portrayal of him or not, but at least not pulled from thin air for entertainment value, but I of course I don't know the truth there. The bracelet thing was a tad over the top, but again, Armstrong kept that one close to the vest, and various people who knew him said it was a strong possibility, but unknown so big "maybe." I enjoyed this article on that one:
https://screencrush.com/did-neil-arm...t-on-the-moon/
Yeah, I know. Interesting that there were so many perceptions. John Logsdon wrote a piece for www.space.com, he worked with the Apollo program, and knew Armstrong after the Apollo program, said that the movie portrayed him as overly somber and mercurial. It may have been that the actor was trying to be thoughtful and quiet and reserved, but came across has mercurial and troubled.
Armstrong did not throw the bracelet into the crater, but he did name a crater for his daughter which was equally respectful and cool.
I like the movie for its special effects and it's scenes and how it treated the Apollo program. I thought the opening sequence was pure genius.
My 2 drachmas. People watch these movies and see different things.
NO chazelle or whatever his name is says the mission transcends countries and is not about the USA and about mankind
and he did it on purpose !
keep supporting these people's pockets then wonder the left keeps gaining ground ? hahahahahahha
I won't pay money to see it because of the American flag thing and the reason it is not in the movie. F U hollyweird and your anti-American BS, putting men on the moon was not a world or mankind achievement it was American exceptionalism at it's best. I watched the flag planting live on TV, I remember to this day how it felt to be a proud American, middle of the cold war, middle of the Viet Nam war and promise kept to an assassinated President, the last good Democrat one we had. And some worthless actor/director types decide to cut it from the movie. I can't do much to hurt those assholes but I don't have to give them my money.
I'd give it a "B". Well done. As an airline pilot and NASA history buff (grew up in Houston) it seems like they did a fair job of portraying Neil. Word is he was quiet and introverted, but one of the smartest pilots and engineers around. I liked the opening scene in the X15, the look on my wifes face when she asked me what was happening and I replied that he was skipping off the atmosphere... She said "figures you'd know that" went to the other room and watched a chick flick... Too slow for her.
Imho, they should have spent more time talking on Neils earlier exploits. The man is a true pilots pilot. He'd seen a lot BEFORE signing on to Apollo. I also they'd have given more time to Mike and Buzz. Here's a good short read on what Neil had done to qualify him to get to the point where he was. The guy was shot down in Korea and later on survived a catastrophic engine failure in a bomber that most other people might have crashed. https://www.businessinsider.com/neil...moments-2012-8
Not as good as The Right Stuff, but good. A little slow at times but good. If you have not seen the right stuff, it's dated but a must see if you're into this kind of stuff.
I hear ya. No doubt, it's impossible to really peg a human being and everyone will see them/remember them differently. He did seem a bit somber, but I thought the reasons and such was well done.
Agreed! Maybe one of the best movies in recent history.
There was no thing. It was invented controversy for click bait and faux outrage.
I think they at least tried to give that impression, but the movie was already 2:20 long. I mean, there's obviously a reason even among "the right stuff" he ended up commanding that Apollo mission. Like say Blade Runner or 2001 one, slow parts just made the not slow parts that much better. The pacing and visuals are just spot on.