Cant stand the animations in the video.
Its a great way to lose all credibility... as well as wearing a sport jacket over a tshirt.
We are not a demoncracy by design.
Sounds like radical progressivism worded to get normal people on board.
Printable View
Cant stand the animations in the video.
Its a great way to lose all credibility... as well as wearing a sport jacket over a tshirt.
We are not a demoncracy by design.
Sounds like radical progressivism worded to get normal people on board.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=owJJQgt_jgs
Jennifer Lawrence looks like Brie Larson only uglier. She has a toe face and they can cram their Democracy which is for Thespians and Boy Lovers
Pretty much this. Tackling major issues (let’s pick “common sense” gun laws) has proven too long and difficult at the national level. The big money this movement says it is opposed too is masked behind small teams at the grass roots level and is used to support localized celebrities (let’s pick Parkland kids). Feel good community outreach canvassing starts, and people are gentle brow beaten into joining the herd via social media virtue signaling, etc. Joiners are good, abstainers are bad. Still boils down to a binary system. Is you is, or is you ins’t my constituents?Quote:
Originally Posted by Honu
Ps- I forgot to add #thisishowthecivilwarbegins #istraintogulag :suicide:
Sure looks like the liberal left trying not to look like the liberal left while still wanting to do liberal left things.
"the greatest trick the devil ever played..............."
This.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightvisionary
And a whole lot of ****ing this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Norseman
She made a big announcement about a year ago during "award season" that she was taking time off from making films to pursue politics due to being triggered by Trump. She is a staunch leftist. I have little doubt that she is a big Beto donor too as most of his record setting donations are coming form Hollyweird. Anyone else notice the comments? Seem to be censored due to the lack of anything questioning them or critical of them. Also the penned commit is wholly predictable, "No we don't get funding from Soros." LOL!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qroQvS3YcWo
Didn’t know any of this about her, though I’m not super surprised. To be fair though, they did post a comment about the democracy term that cleared that up.
All of that being said though, assume their claims are accurate (wouldn’t surprise me). IF the organization actually did what it was trying to do, would it be that bad? Obviously that’s kind of a dangerous game, but if the option is worthless bullshit happening in Congress and politicians doing whatever they want, is that worse than them having to listen more to the people? I’m not talking about getting rid of the electoral college so there is only a popular vote, but I don’t see how anyone can argue against congressional reform. I will say that I’m surprised they didn’t mention anything about term limits though.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's a dangerous game to the tune of that is what the road to hell is paved with.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wake27
We can read the federalist papers and other founding documents and find out the details of the deal. I honestly don't think many of the people considered to be founders had any intention of abiding by the deal they made with the citizenry. There was no real punishment for violations of the deal and that wasn't by accident.
Violations of the Constitution should have been treated as treason. As an early example, had Adams and his cronies been sent to prison (or the here after) over the sedition acts we wouldn't have many of the problems we have today.
There is no mistaking that the Washington beast has left a big stinking turd on the front porch of the American citizen. And, yes things need to to change, and no, I will not even pretend that I know of a solution.
But, with that being said, there is enough nuggets in the video and JL's background to make me suspicious of what looks like an attempt to take that turd, repackage and re brand and try to offer it up as a gift out of the "goodness of their heart for the country".
I fully admit that I am cynical and jaded towards this stuff these days, especially when it comes from the liberalism stand point. Liberalism is often touted as being a disease, but in a vast majority of cases it is not since a disease denotes there is a cure. For a lot of these folks it is more of a genetic marker hardwired into their core beliefs, and can not be changed.
More often than not when someone like this comes along spouting about change they really aren't talking about changing their perception of the world, their trying to change our perception of them and what they believe.
"Meet the new boss, same as the old boss"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHhrZgojY1Q
would bypassing congress be bad ? yeah badQuote:
Originally Posted by Wake27
would not putting candidates like President Trump on ballots ? yeah bad
making sure large liberal cities have the most power to vote ? yeah bad
mob rule or those with the biggest voice that control media taking away your rights ? yeah bad
etc...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norseman
Ding ding ding!!!! --- she is a rabid liberal trying to drum up the 18 year old voter. Those that just graduated from High school with a 5th grade education.