I don't know. Don't we have Airwolf hidden somewhere in the desert?
Printable View
I don't know. Don't we have Airwolf hidden somewhere in the desert?
Does it have an automated self nose dive feature like the Boeing max?
In addition to Bell, Boeing, and Sikorsky, AVX and Karem are also in the FARA-CP competition.
https://www.helis.com/database/news/...ara-ausa-2019/
https://defpost.com/ausa-2019-karem-...otype-program/
That's the S-97 Raider that lists 50-cal; it is different than Sikorsky's FARA-CP design. They look similar, but are indeed different.Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater
See: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us...-raider-x.html
Here's a look at all five:
https://defpost.com/u-s-army-fara-pr...eting-designs/
It's really interesting to see so many notably divergent designs all competing for the same contract. Usually you only see two, three at the most and they're pretty similar in physical envelope and operation.Quote:
Originally Posted by DrMark
Have we ever had a mainstream coaxial design before?
I know the Soviets/Russians have used them extensively, but I don't recall the US ever adopting one.
We've used the crazy-looking Kaman intermeshing rotor helos, but never a coax.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grand58742
Looks like thanks to budget cuts they had to accelerate the down select. They could no longer afford to fund 5 prototypes so now it's just Bell and Sikorsky.
Seems like they went with the one they really wanted (Sikorsky) and then hedged their bets on the safest lowest risk but also lowest performing option (Bell).
https://www.defensenews.com/smr/army...rcraft-budget/
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk