Why aren't automakers held responsible for crimes committed with their cars? If they can hold little girls responsible for talking their boyfriends into suicide, why won't anyone hold Hollywood responsible for promoting all kinds of socially deviant bs?
Or beer and alcohol manufacturers... How many people die directly or indirectly (drunk driver) from alcohol? The hypocrisy is astounding.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, to be honest, other industries have had these frivolous lawsuits too. McDonald's making people fat and such, because it was their responsibility to tell lardasses that they've had enough Big Macs for one century.Quote:
Originally Posted by pomyc
I'm suing Dixie for their plastic spoons making me fat.Quote:
Originally Posted by BoringGuy45
Freedom doesn't come from federal judges...
I am 100% it will be overturned.
^^^QFTQuote:
Originally Posted by prepare
Assuming the plaintiffs win in the first place.Quote:
Originally Posted by Biggy
They're arguing under a few assumptions that have yet to be decided officially:
-The weapons sold were weapons of war not designed or intended for civilian ownership.
-Though currently legal, it was common sense that these weapons should not have been offered for sale to the public. Therefore, the gun makers acted recklessly by selling them to civilians.
Of course, that's the point behind it: Get an assault weapons ban passed without actually passing one; the gun companies realize it's too financially risky to sell to the public, and they'll pull their products off the market.
Of course, if it is ever upheld that ARs are protected by the 2nd Amendment, it will be a lot harder to bring these lawsuits forward.
Manufacture liable for injuries and deaths resulting from the unlawful use of their products?
Is the truck manufacture liable for the 11 injuries and 9 deaths in the New York City truck attack a couple years ago? Is Boeing liable for the injuries and deaths on 911?