The mainstream media appears to be reporting what Gregory McMichael told the police about chasing him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthel...ull.pdf#page=1
Printable View
The mainstream media appears to be reporting what Gregory McMichael told the police about chasing him.Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthel...ull.pdf#page=1
The two perps said they armed themselves and engaged in hunting down a man they saw running and decided was a criminal, though they did not see him commit a crime.Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade
This is an amazingly straight forward part of this whole ordeal.
Why didn’t the DA Perdue a case? Because it would have ruined every case I. The past the father had been an investigator in the past.
This thread is peak Dunning Kruger. A bunch of internet attorney/investigators playing around on their 'jump to conclusions' mat, with a fraction of the evidence and a bunch of hearsay.
Well you have to kind of admit, as soon as we have a full belly and shelter, the human condition seems to look for someone to hate.Quote:
Originally Posted by elephantrider
I can't even begin to understand why these two got in the car to pursue this guy, let alone draw a gun.
Interesting. Things that jumped out:Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbhike
caught on surveillance camera claim
if true, that supports their version he was not out for a run. If there's no vid, it kills their credibility.
Police have already stated there were no reports of any other crime in the area.Quote:
Originally Posted by WillBrink
Funny how some people on here (not you Will) are so willing to ignore everything else and focus on one little thing to justify their own bias.
Not uncommon to not report petty theft, especially from job sites.Quote:
Originally Posted by kwelz
Which also has no impact on whether he was or was or was not, on their surveillance cam and that's what set them off to go looking for him. If they have vid of him on their cam, that's a game changer as far as the jogging claim. Whether legal to go after him I don't know. I read he was 12 miles from his home. That's one hell of a jog. Maybe he drove to an area he enjoyed jogging, parked and went for a run, but it was his family claimed he was out for a jog.Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade
This post is a perfect example of Trotsky winning.Quote:
Originally Posted by Uni-Vibe
Blacks were enslaved and exploited by other blacks in Africa and middle easterners first long long before being brought to the colonies. Thousands of years before that white Europeans were enslaved and exploited by white Europeans and others. Asians were enslaved and exploited by Asians and others. Middle easterners were enslaved and exploited by middle easterners and others. The Black slaves in the US and racism is a post Trotsky and uniquely US leftist argument.
Here he is entering a construction sight and apparently absconding with nothing, so no felony they witnessed to justify their actions.Quote:
Originally Posted by WillBrink
https://www.ajc.com/news/crime--law/...0k9cr80R7CTnL/
And he still could have been jogging.
Not seen it here, but one of the claims I have read levied against him in other venues was he was too far away from home to have been jogging and that distance was allegedly 2 miles.