Supreme Court Turns away ALL Second Amendment Cases

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

06-15-20, 12:02
Esq.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SomeOtherGuy

Police can't confiscate "outlawed" guns if there are no police!!! You can thank BLM / Soros / Antifa for your 2A!!! Hahaha

/sarc

Seriously, if you don't see a massive push for a Red-guards / Gestapo / SS type political "police" force, you need to start paying attention. Obama promised as much a decade ago, and it's easy to read between the lines of the current fringe calls for abolishing police.

Yea, it's not like this is "new" playbook. When people like Obama say things, it's not random nonsense. Everything is measured, tested etc...they know exactly what they are doing. It's no different than Hitler writing Mein Kampfh. They literally TOLD US what they are going to do. Why is that so hard for so many people to understand given the obvious historical examples? This shit HAPPENED BEFORE, We've been told they intend to DO IT AGAIN, and it's ACTUALLY HAPPENING.....I've heard and read of people walking into the gas chambers in complete disbelief- I never thought that would be possible again, but I fear I'm wrong.....
06-15-20, 12:06
Alex V

Wait. Did you really expect them to take on these cases after rejecting the NYC case last month? Come on guys.
06-15-20, 12:10
Esq.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alex V

Wait. Did you really expect them to take on these cases after rejecting the NYC case last month? Come on guys.

Yes, as an attorney I can honestly say that Legally, their decision to turn away the NYC case was appropriate. Or, if not appropriate it certainly was on very strong legal grounds. I fully expected it to be rejected. These other cases- involving LIVE cases and controversies, not hardly. Given the absolute number at least one of them should have been taken up. It tells you all you need to know.
06-15-20, 12:38
Alex V

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esq.

Yes, as an attorney I can honestly say that Legally, their decision to turn away the NYC case was appropriate. Or, if not appropriate it certainly was on very strong legal grounds. I fully expected it to be rejected. These other cases- involving LIVE cases and controversies, not hardly. Given the absolute number at least one of them should have been taken up. It tells you all you need to know.

SCOTUS refused to hear Peruta, they refused to hear Drake, I don't know why you guys are so surprised?

If I recall correctly, they have refused to hear ANY 2A case since McDonald, 10 years ago.
06-15-20, 12:47
Adrenaline_6

Not sure if this is what's happening, but due Robert's and his missing dick, it probably wold be more ideal if we wait, pending Trump's re-election to replace Ginsberg with another conservative. This would render Roberts and his missing dick inconsequential.
06-15-20, 13:08
Tx_Aggie

Hedging their bets against Trump losing in November?
06-15-20, 13:23
PracticalRifleman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adrenaline_6

Not sure if this is what's happening, but due Robert's and his missing dick, it probably wold be more ideal if we wait, pending Trump's re-election to replace Ginsberg with another conservative. This would render Roberts and his missing dick inconsequential.

Yeah if we have another Trump pick maybe one of them may be on our side? [emoji23]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
06-15-20, 13:31
Det-Sog

Just wait until the court is stacked (D) however many years from now. Trust me, they will start hearing 2nd cases then.
06-15-20, 14:33
Adrenaline_6

Quote:

Originally Posted by PracticalRifleman

Yeah if we have another Trump pick maybe one of them may be on our side? [emoji23]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Maybe...maybe not, but SCOTUS rulings set precedent. You need to skillfully decide when to hear those cases, because this affects further rulings in a similar manner.
06-15-20, 16:11
Honu

Quote:

Originally Posted by Esq.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-c...140235652.html

Do you understand yet? Really, do YOU UNDERSTAND?

There is a war going on in this country. You may not believe it- you're wrong. You may not think it has anything to do with you- but sticking your head in the sand is a sure way to get your ass kicked.

sarcasm inbound
come on get over it we all know we don't need guns that what the police are for since they are trained :)
so all we have to do is call the police (cough cough what 911 I got a counselor what defunded police there are no police OH NO)
sarcasm off

yeah I read that today and with as mentioned above prisoners being released defunding of cops building up of BLM police now funded with billions of dollars and gov backing etc...

as obama started the hatred of the police and his saying this

Quote:

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded

I reckon this is coming true now its not obama himself he was like many others along the way part of the bigger group of socialist/communist/progressive they change names like a model does shoes

I do often wonder if what the Russians thought with the collapse of the USSR and how quick it happened ? I know we are not them but take any great nation toppling and reforming itself are we next ?

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page