Hmm, seems larger than I expected. What's the weight including Trijicon's own mount? I guess they're going for the Aimpoint micro market the way it's sized and priced.
Printable View
Hmm, seems larger than I expected. What's the weight including Trijicon's own mount? I guess they're going for the Aimpoint micro market the way it's sized and priced.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh-L
dots work better in my book, but thats me
the dinner plate sized dots are at 100yards and make com hits very easy and fast the 8-9 moa version i tried i would agree that 4-6 moa would be better
Weight on both units is 1.2 oz.
Price? And when will these be available? I'm about to pull the trigger on an H-1 but would love to see these before I do.
Awesome, just awesome.Quote:
Originally Posted by bullitt5172
But, for the love of God! Why no chevron reticule?!
Indeed. It seems to me that the chevron would greatly enhance the accuracy at long range. Does it not also give you two aiming points to help with holds at various ranges? I think you guys are missing the boat on this one. Blob shaped dots suck IMHO.Quote:
Originally Posted by Armati
Mule
It would appear "why no other choice besides a dot" is the magic question.....
I'm going to wager that their new fibre optic design lends itself to washout prevention in a dot form at the moment.
I'm completely and totally guessing, but I can only assume that is why their new offerings are foregoing the chevie. I could be very wrong...
I wouldn't think the shape of the reticle would have anything to do with how good the fiber optic system worked. But I don't build them either so....
I'm just fancyin' a guess, bro. I can't think of any reason why they wouldn't go for the Chevron, certainly not because of unpopularity of the reticle.