Originally Posted by
rmecapn
Practical advice?!?! The responses made him think if he didn't purchase a Colt, LMT, or G&R LPK then his lower would be caca! I've been around this site since when it actually belonged to G&R Tactical and the one thing I've never seen is emprical data to support that a CMT or RRA LPK has a higher failure rate of parts than does Colt or LMT. If it exists, it would be great to see it. Maybe Pat Rogers has a log of such things. While the manufacturing criteria for the Colt, LMT, and G&R kits may be stricter, that does constitute real world examples of failure rates in actual use. That is practical information that an individual needs when making an informed decision.