Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMGLee
It will pull double duty and its home will be on my 6.8mm rig... I run an Insight
M6X on the same rig and I have grown an affinity for thier products...
They are very rugged in thier design.
The J-point would be more considerable over the Buris FF2 as far as specs go... The Mrds would be more desireable over the J-point in terms of specs and at a mere 70.00 difference in price....
Ummm...What rail system is that?
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMGLee
it's the Addax ATAC GPU. the rails are unique to that setup:Quote:
Originally Posted by RAM Engineer
http://www.militarymorons.com/weapon...ers3.html#atac
"'expensive' is a relative term and needs to be qualified."
MM, you are absolutely right.
In the majority of instances, a MRDS is a 1x back-up to another sight or optic, or used as a CQB alternative to a magnified optic. As a back up, it should not run so close to the price of the primary optic that the idea of just packing a spare primary starts to become a cost effective alternative. If using the "bang for the buck" principle, this MRDS, although robust, just isn't providing enough bang to justify the bucks in my opinion.
yup - if you want 'bang for the buck', the fastfire is probably the one to get.
as far as being close to the price of the primary optic, the MRDS is about half that of the optic it was designed to as a close-quarters alternative/backup to - the ACOG.
Good point. I saw the pics of it mounted on a rail as a primary (great pics by the way, this MRDS looks robust) and that tripped the $500.00 price point in my brain. The Eotech, Aimpoint, etc. 1X price point that this MRDS fall into. BTW, I love your site. I won't buy anything anymore without checking out your sight and MM's first. Thanks and keep up the good work!
kmrtnsn - thanks for the kind words and i'm glad you've found my site useful. i'm a civilian hobbyist/consumer, and budget/cost is a major factor in any purchase.
with products suchs as the MRDS, i'm not trying to convince anyone that they need something like it, or that it's better for their intended usage, but just conveying why it may cost more. the added robustness may not make a difference to us who would view a sight breaking down as an inconvenience on the range or during a match, but may make the difference to the user out on the battlefield engaging the enemy.
when it comes to optics/gear/equipment designed primarily for military usage, it's often not so much that they don't provide the 'bang for the buck', but more that we (joe civilian hobbyist enthusiast) don't really utilize them (or need them) for the full spectrum of conditions that they're designed for. to the civilian user, what may seem expensive for a hobby gun might be a well-justified expense for a work gun. all i try to do is to provide information, so people can make their own informed decisions.
Keep it up! The effort is both noticed, and appreciated.
Having both a "work gun" and a hobby gun I see the difference is what I need and expect from one to the other. I am in the process of building a hobby gun with which I am testing the bang for the buck principle first hand. As these things go they tend to be expensive lessons in what works and what doesn't but I wanted to try different ideas and products with this concept. Hopefully the end of the month all of my "parts" will have arrived and I can finish painting it and post some pics. I imagine that it is going to be a continuingly evolving rifle as ideas and the associated items fail the concept and are replaced with others. For my rifle the Fastfire II is one of those items to be "tested". We'll all see how it goes.
I've got a Burris FF2 and it's great on my "hobby gun". The problem is I end up putting more rounds through this carbine than all of the others combined. It's a complete build from scratch but I did use all good quality parts. FWIW I've got a NightForce, 2 T-1's, and 1 Acog w/Doctor on my other carbines.
I will probably end up looking hard at the Insight. I should add that the reality is that the T-1 is marginally larger than the FF2 when both are mounted in Larue mounts. I was just comparing them the other night.
I also agree about not relying on the FF2 for my primary optic. It's just light, quick, and small. I've not had any issues over the last year but that doesn't mean much. It's been to the range probably 1 dozen times. On one of our SWAT training days I take it each month and let someone train with it for the day. Figure 100-200 rounds a day for those training days. The little BUIS on the Larue mount is very basic and works great for what it is. For me it's a 4-6 MOA sight which isn't bad for what it is with that enormous aperture. The only bad thing about the FF2 is the single setting for brightness, ON. It starbursts pretty bad but again for what it is and about $350.00 with mount it's pretty cool for my frankengun.
MM,
What mount are you using for the mRDS?
Keep up the amazing work on your site!
O