Plus how many AR owners are going to attach a grenade luncher to there rifle? I would say not many! Just a waste of money to make that cut in the outside of barrel for the M4 look.
Printable View
Plus how many AR owners are going to attach a grenade luncher to there rifle? I would say not many! Just a waste of money to make that cut in the outside of barrel for the M4 look.
Is that a 325 crest I see there?
Bob
Yes sir it is. I was in the 3/325th Abn Inf-82nd Abn Div. :D
Interesting find on page 31, and I will quote "a 1:9 twist appears to be optimum for the army rifle". Let the arguing commence.
While the completion backwards principle M-4 barrel profile is indeed strange, so too is the Marine Corps adoption of the M-16A4 rifle with 20" barrel and fixed buttstock. What was the rationale behind that retrograde move?