Yes, on their website they don't list HP testing. However, I still think FailZero may test fire their bcgs' a few times because I remember mine came dirty with carbon deposits.
Printable View
2 of the rifles have around 200rds through, the BCG appears brand new as does the interals of the upper. The 3rd rifle has about 1000rds, the BCG also appears new, but the upper shows minor internal wear at the usual contact points. I still keep everything lubed and I still clean after every use. I don't know if I'm a good test case because I keep everything immaculate. I'd be curious to see what happens if a rifle was ran dirty for an extended period, however my OCD will not let me find out! :)
Has anyone had decent results with paint adhesion to EXO...?
I have a BCG and hammer in my shorty AR, and it runs beautifully. The carbon and fouling come off a lot easier with the XO coating, so I've considered buying more, but I'm finding it hard to justify the cost on rifles I already have with BCM BCG's. If I did another upper build, I would probably buy one of these again, though.
Indeed I have been using Fail Zero BCGs, in fact, I've been using one since they first came out. I have had zero problems, and have used them in FA, suppressed, and semi auto fire.
I'm currently working on a review for Military Times regarding the Fail Zero BCG, but there are some unrelated issues that popped up that I need to deal with before I can complete everything. No problem with the Fail Zero parts at all.
^^
I love your signature. :)