Quote:
Originally Posted by ICANHITHIMMAN
How many rounds were in your 200yard 1/4" group?
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by ICANHITHIMMAN
How many rounds were in your 200yard 1/4" group?
I was having problems getting good groups with my TR24G triangle too! I guess it's not my fault :p
I was getting 1.5-2" groups with match ammo. I can usually do better with open sights but who likes using those things?
However, the TR24G is fast and rocks up close and is definitely MinuteOfMan out to any effective range.
Dennis.
When scopes became popular for hunting in the western sates after WWII the 4X was almost a standard. Thousands of Elk, Deer and other game were taken at all pratical ranges using a 4X. It is not a target scope but in the field it is pretty good.
Sorry for the late responce I shoot 5 round groups at 200 for all my load testing.
I did not shoot the groups rapid fire just one round at a time. The wilson combat was one hell of a shooter.
The ACOGS are great and I have 20/10 vision and lots of trigger time.
Like Belmont said, I think the target plays an important part in getting a small group. I print targets with a substantial black donut ring with a white center and match the size of the white center to the crosshair, range, etc. I make the targets to precisely fit the crosshairs at a particualr range.
When I center the crosshairs, I want to see 4 evenly shaped "pieces of white pie" around the crosshairs. this is how I "sight-in" (or calibrate) my sights. When I shoot my RDS, I make a target that will give me a little white ring around the red dot with a thick black ring around everything. It makes it easy to center and repeat.
I always found it difficult at best to accurately shoot with black crosshairs on a black bullseye. Now, for just shooting, I may use black, red, orange, white bullseye targets because that is “practical” ... but to sight-in, I want a maximum contrast between target and crosshairs or red dot.
Below are a couple of targets I found to show what I mean.
http://i54.tinypic.com/2nlbuwn.jpg
http://i56.tinypic.com/ztt4w8.jpg
http://i54.tinypic.com/25fng3q.jpg
.
To finish my post...
I think a 4X scope with the right ammo, proper rests, a good target and of course a good barrel can shoot exceptional groups.
To me, people think that magnification is the "big" contributor to accuracy using a scope. I think the single biggest improvement using a scope is having the sight and the target in the same focal plane.
Now, this is just me and I ain't no marksman but I have experimented with open sights, a 1X scope and at 24X scope at 100-yards. With the 1X scope my group size is reduced by about 50% from open sights, 4" to about 2" . With a 24X scope, my group reduced about an additional 40% or down to 1-1/4". Important Note: I was shooting a target specific to the reticle or open sight. I know this isn't very scientific but I think it makes a point that the same focal plane benefit of a scope is the biggest improvement - at least to me (that's my unscientific disclaimer).
So, with all of that said, I think you could easily shoot some great groups with a 4X scope. I'd like to see what Molon thinks about all of this.
But maybe it's just me...
.
=================================Quote:
Originally Posted by XxMerlinxX
What kind of groups were you getting?
.
Ive come to think that the optic should have no effect on group size, only POI. Doesnt really matter if your using a 10X or a 3X aim in the same spot everytime and if the group sucks, its the shooter (well except for really crappy gear to a point). That being said, I hold 1.5" groups with my specter DR @100 on 4X or 1X with even PMC ammo in my SCAR....
I agree - providing you can discern the target well enough through the optic to aim precisely at the same point every time.Quote:
Originally Posted by 99HMC4
For example, a traditional "duplex" crosshair is usually fairly easy to align on a typical NRA type round target and achieve consistent grouping. A sight with a 3 or 4 MOA dot in the center, not so much.