Bill- i think you are stretching the truth out a tad far. The testing done earlier this year, and the subject of the trade paper article, had to do only with M4 Carbines and M16A4 Rifles.
There were no commercial guns involved, regardless of the maker.
For you to suggest that the study showed anything to do with other than an
M4/ M16A4 is like trying to compare apples with softballs.
I think everyone understands your agenda, but it is beyond my feeble powers of comprehension to make sense out of your post- reproduced below, and how it relates to the test in any size, shape or form.
"applying to the numbers posted on this forum a lubed Bushmaster IS IN FACT MORE RELIABLE THAN A COLT FIREARM OF SIMILAR DESIGN RUNNING IN A DRY CONFIGURATION. "

