Originally Posted by
ucrt
.
Just wondering...
I know that proper fitting is the first indicator of a good LPK but I don't think it is the best indicator?
I think the "fit" is just an early indicator of quality and the true indicator is how it holds up after many thousands of rounds? If it doesn't fit properly, it is disqualified right off the bat, but because it does fit properly, that doesn't mean it will last and hold up.
It seems a lot of people call a properly fitting LPK gtg, even before they fire the first round with it. I think that is jumping the gun on gtg a wee bit.
Even with LPK stock triggers, isn't it "acceptable" to have a trigger that is a little gritty, rough, and creepy at first??
I have always heard to not judge a trigger until you have 500-600 rounds through it. In September, a buddy had a new DD trigger that was gritty as heck but it turned out OK after just a few hundred rounds.
Just curious why no one is challenging a lot of the gtg claims of LPK's that have just recently become available, instead of giving them a "possibly gtg" or "optimistically gtg"?
But maybe it's just me...
.