Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: PWS FC556 or DynaComp

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    44
    Feedback Score
    0

    Question PWS FC556 or DynaComp

    Between the two (PWS FC556 or DynaComp) which is a better brake?

    I'd appreciate your opinion on either based on your own experience.

    Thanks guys....

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    VA/OH
    Posts
    29,631
    Feedback Score
    33 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by 2arkba View Post
    Between the two (PWS FC556 or DynaComp) which is a better brake?

    I'd appreciate your opinion on either based on your own experience.

    Thanks guys....
    PWS, but with that said, I would choose neither.

    If I HAD TO HAVE a MB, I would go with the BattleComp. The reasons are:

    1. Has the least (annoying) concusion of any MB I have seen.
    2. The flash signature is one of the bes I have seen for a MB.


    C4

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    325
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Grant is on the ball with his brakes.

    Surefire brake if you want to run suppressed.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Jackson, MI
    Posts
    143
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    Battle Comp 2.0 can accept suppressors such as the Gemtech Halo.

    With that said, I agree with all of the above that the Battle Comp is the way to go. Minimal side blast and the flash signature looks about the same as the A2. You don't get that with many comps.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Occupied Territory
    Posts
    1,212
    Feedback Score
    19 (100%)
    While a BattleComp is always our first choice , we would also say the PWS FSC556 is an excellent product, and compliant in all the ban states.
    Battle Comp Enterprises, LLC
    World Class Tactical Compensators
    California Legal Compensators
    100% American Made
    www.battlecomp.com
    sales@battlecomp.com
    (650) 678-0778

    1 Samuel 17:49 / Romans 13: 1-4 / Isaiah 6:8 / Psalms 144:1 / Matthew 12:30

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    92
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    i have a dynacomp and got to test one before they came out, and im pleased with the results. its G2G in my book and so is the surefire option you listed.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    CNY
    Posts
    8,465
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    PWS, but with that said, I would choose neither.

    If I HAD TO HAVE a MB, I would go with the BattleComp.
    Curious to know what you'd recommend if we weren't talking strictly muzzle brakes?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    CA
    Posts
    325
    Feedback Score
    5 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by chadil1ac View Post
    Battle Comp 2.0 can accept suppressors such as the Gemtech Halo.
    +1 for that.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,378
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)
    I have to ask the eternal M4C question:
    What will you be doing with this gun?


    I've used the A2, the Battlecomp 1.0, and the PWS on my duty/SWAT and HD guns. I've narrowed down to the A2 (duty) and the BC (HD), after my experience with the PWS. Not a bad product, but didn't fit my needs.

    Read about it HERE.
    The advice above is worth exactly what you paid for it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    241
    Feedback Score
    35 (100%)
    I have the BC 1.5 because I live in a ban state. It is an amazing comp and keeps your shots flat. If I didn't live in a ban state I would use a nice FH. They are cheap and do their job.
    PAIN IS WEAKNESS LEAVING THE BODY

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •