Grant,
What is the weight of it and a comparable 6920?
Also, do they seem to balance the same? How does it feel?
Can't wait to get my hands on that BCM lower. Thanks again for all your help.
Alex
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grant,
What is the weight of it and a comparable 6920?
Also, do they seem to balance the same? How does it feel?
Can't wait to get my hands on that BCM lower. Thanks again for all your help.
Alex
There going to go through all this again and again they'll stick to DI. The problem I have with all the piston AR offerings as a civilian is the lack of user changeable rails on the market currently.
^^^Agreed
Grant do you know why they put gas rings in the bolt?
Ohhhhh, I like these!
Yes, please post pictures of the rails, and the inside of the upper receiver compared to a standard upper.
If they have rails inside, that should fix the carrier tilt problem.
I don't know if it is possible or not but if Colt wants to keep the FSP could they make a rail that would wrap around and extend out another 2 to 3 inches? The rail is just too short!
Also it would be nice if they would offer a version without the notch on the barrel for a grenade launcher.
I took a look on colts website.
They have the 6940 listed at 6.8 lb and the 6940P listed at 6.9 lb.
.1 lb is really not much.... intriguing. For comparative purposes, the base 6920 came it at 6.9 lb also and the 6720 came in at 6.2
per colts website:
6920- 6.9
6940P- 6.9
6940- 6.8
6720- 6.2
Last edited by Amur; 03-16-12 at 12:10.
Bookmarks