I have read/heard many complaints about the triggers on H.K. pistols.
Why doesn't somebody just design a better trigger for these guns? Is there something inherent in the design of an H.K. pistol to prevent such a thing from happening?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I have read/heard many complaints about the triggers on H.K. pistols.
Why doesn't somebody just design a better trigger for these guns? Is there something inherent in the design of an H.K. pistol to prevent such a thing from happening?
That is my only complaint about H&K pistols.
Gray Guns offers trigger jobs for these pistols, and more than a few people have sent their H&K pistols to him for his services. I have yet to hear of an issue caused by him improving the trigger, so I have to assume that there is room in the design for improvement, without effecting performance. H&K would have a lot more civilian customers if they just improved this aspect of their pistols.
http://grayguns.com/gunsmith-service...-koch-pistols/
Last edited by balance; 03-17-12 at 18:06.
Train through the trigger shortcomings. It is the best method.
What's wrong with them?
I've heard one of the lem versions is very similar to the triggers on kahr pistols. Is that an accurate representation? Are they as long a pull, but as smooth as the kahr?
Since I have two H&K LEM pistols and two Kahrs, I'll give you my thoughts on this question.
They are similar, but they are different. They are more similar than they are different, however.
Both have a long pull.
Kahr is much smoother and more like a very good double action revolver.
The H&K LEM does have more distinct stages to its pull travel. Initial travel is lighter (just trigger return spring pressure) than later stage.
That said, I do not find transitioning between these two systems to be a problem. Therefore I find my Kahr PM9 as a compact solution, and H&K P30 as full size solution, to work well together.
Bookmarks