|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I had three different Kimbers that worked fine when I sold them, and each had passed the 500 round break-in.
I now have MIM free 1911's: Baer (UTC), Brown (Special Forces), Dan Wesson (Valor).
FYI: Colt reportedly has four MIM parts in their 1911's, so if anyone is resolved to only use the "best" to defend themself and theirs...
No longer posting on M4 carbine - CDW4ME
I'm QA, not QC. It was a discussion, not a mass movement to create a new standard. If I was going to go through all the trouble to develop a better standard you better damn well believe that I'm bringing it to market and not opening it up to open discussion with random people on the internet. Lighten up Francis.
Originally Posted by Jaykayyy
There is a difference in leading a discussion and being antagonistic, and most of your posts have been the latter. You spend your money on what you want and I'll do the same. Frankly thanks to this forum I was able to learn a ton of info before I purchased my AR (BCM 16in. Middy) and I may not put thousands of rounds through it a year but I know it will work when I want/need it too.
So do you know the definition of quality yet, or do you still have it confused with order fulfillment accuracy?
Shit is this thread still going?
If you have needs/requirements/wants that differ from what a TDP spec'd rifle can offer you, then go buy or build another rifle to fill your niche.
Otherwise, the TDP is the best set of criteria for building a reliable general purpose carbine while maintaining a cost threshold and known quality.
Ken Bloxton
Skill > Gear
Bookmarks