Page 12 of 16 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast
Results 111 to 120 of 151

Thread: Springfield Professional or Wilson CQB

  1. #111
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    South Texas
    Posts
    2,740
    Feedback Score
    52 (98%)
    Quote Originally Posted by JG007 View Post
    Have there been any other head to head comparisons? I love torture tests, its kind of like the UFC of product reviews.
    You'd have to live for a long to see which one lasted longer and it ain't a mystery what it takes to choke a 1911.
    They're both at the top of the foodchain when it comes to workin' guns. Pick which one you happen to like best.

  2. #112
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    942
    Feedback Score
    0
    My professional should be arriving any day!

  3. #113
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    48
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I've had both. The new SA Pros have fully ramped (Wilson/Nowlin ramp specs), SA barrels. The feed ramp angle is too steep on these barrels and you will likely find that the gun will run much longer without feed way stoppages if you have the feed ramp angle increased. If you poke around the internet a bit, you'll see that a certain fed agency has this mod done to the guns it issues.

    Most Wilson guns have the standard JMB barrel ramp- they work very well. My CQB was extremely reliable and well put together. Unfortunately, I had to increase the feed ramp angle on my Pro before I could get it to go 1000 rounds without a malfunction.

    My two cents-

  4. #114
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    43
    Feedback Score
    0
    So, after my initial debacle with my Springfield Pro jamming every round (admittedly purchased for $900 at a gun show) it went back to SA, on their dime, and came back to me shooting 99%. I replaced the magazine springs and it's been 100% reliable in the 2500 rounds I've shot since. Not a single failure. I LOVE this weapon. It was manufactured in 2002 and has the Nowlin barrel. It's not ridiculously tight anymore, but it's the smoothest, softest shooting, most accurate 1911 I've shot.

    I do love the feel in hand of the Nighthawk/Wilson guns but haven't gotten around to picking one up yet. I'm currently thinning down the collection and if I can sell the weapons I'd like to get rid of, I may pick up a Wilson or Nighthawk if I can find one at a reasonable price.

  5. #115
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    NGAMTNS
    Posts
    1,061
    Feedback Score
    14 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by the.batman View Post
    I've had both. The new SA Pros have fully ramped (Wilson/Nowlin ramp specs), SA barrels. The feed ramp angle is too steep on these barrels and you will likely find that the gun will run much longer without feed way stoppages if you have the feed ramp angle increased. If you poke around the internet a bit, you'll see that a certain fed agency has this mod done to the guns it issues.

    Most Wilson guns have the standard JMB barrel ramp- they work very well. My CQB was extremely reliable and well put together. Unfortunately, I had to increase the feed ramp angle on my Pro before I could get it to go 1000 rounds without a malfunction.

    My two cents-
    Got a source for your "two cents"????
    "Bones Heal, Chics Dig Scars, Pain Goes Away"

  6. #116
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Melbourne, FL
    Posts
    63
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have owned a railed CQB and currently own a non-rail Pro. Both guns exhibited 100% reliability. It really comes down to which gun YOU want. If you can swing the scratch, get them both. I own a Wilson UT-15 and Wilson/Scattergun Tech 870, so really feel like I need another CQB to complete the "Triad."
    "You Can't Miss Fast Enough, To Win The Gunfight" - Andy Seminick

  7. #117
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    110
    Feedback Score
    0
    Wilson parts are better, Wilson's stock sights are better. I'd go Wilson.

  8. #118
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    942
    Feedback Score
    0
    Theoretically, but the only time they went head to head, Wilson tapped out and the professional was shown to be the more durable and accurate gun..


    My conclusion, the Wilson may have more style smoothness, and beauty, but SA proved it was tougher and more accurate

  9. #119
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    110
    Feedback Score
    0
    That's crazy talk. Plenty of reasons why Wilson wouldn't want the FBI contract. I own Springfield and Wilson.

  10. #120
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    942
    Feedback Score
    0
    Are you familiar with the fbi 1911 tests? If I recall correctly, the professional is the most tested 1911 of all time, including the original, and I'd ask if there was any handgun ever that went through more testing

Page 12 of 16 FirstFirst ... 21011121314 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •