So I recently got into handguns, been ar15 all my life but everyone needs a sidearm. I recently asked which caliber and got mainly 9mm because of ammo cosy, me being a noob to handguns, and modern bullets evening up firepower. But im a big boy, and wanted big bore, so I got both! I got a s&w m&p 9 coming so now I need my 45. The reason I went with s&w is I see them everywhere, range , classes, costa. Seems to be the new koolaid so im sipping it. My question is should I stick with smith for my 45 or change it up. Hks are the some of the best sh*t since sliced bread. This gun will be strick carry, home defense, and end of the world zombies or china invading. Now I know hk usp is quality, dependable, combat proven and should out live me if I buy brand new. But is it worth the extra cheddar? I know money should never be an object when its for something your putting your life and family life in but ive been told that the smith will do just as good job. So what you think, usp or m&p.
Magazine capacity doesnt matter I dont live in free america (new yorkistan)
Also I know the Hk45 is the new and improved but also is expensive
M&p will be 570 and USP will be 772



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks