Read some interesting discussions over on 10-8, a particular member had some very valid points on the mounting of 1-4x optics. Specifically the short-dot. I think he might be a member here...but here is what he had to say about the 1.93 mount vs the SP4-M4:
Per LarueTactical's website, the 1.93 was developed simply to allow the use of the shortdot to clear the peq2 etc...IF your shooting position will give the required amount of eye relief the SPR 1.93 is the best as it allows for the most “heads up” position with zero head angle induced and is better than the 1.5” for the following:
1. Target to target transitions
2. Movement
3. Natural and level peripheral vision on both eyes
4. Less neck strain (X2 if wearing a Kevlar helmet) (X4 if wearing a Kevlar helmet and a NVG)
The SPR stretch into the SPR-E was to meet my need for a mount to use the Trijicon TR21 on top of a CAS-V rail for the CQBR and with the scope reversed on the FWD rail of the MK14 MOD 0/1. It dose not require the additional hight in the 1.93“ as the weapons rails provide it. The benefit to the NCH shooters on other optics is a unplanned fringe benefit without the heads up position benefits.
Out.
Kevin
Has anyone had similar experiences to the observations made above by Kevin?
Bookmarks