Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Glock Titanium Striker

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,737
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)

    Glock Titanium Striker

    Today I received the "Glock Titanium Striker" (Item #LS002S) from the GlockStore and installed into my Gen 4 G17. Just dry firing, I am not impressed with the trigger pull, just doesn't feel right. Of course I don't know what I was expecting, just hoping for a faster lock time.

    Will hit the range tomorrow or Friday and test it out live. Assume that is the only way to test "lock time". Just don't like the feel.

    Will shortly post my testing results, was wonder if any of you have any experience with the "Titanium Striker" from GlockStore?


    Thanks

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    11
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    what is "lock time?" the time between pulling the trigger and the striker hitting the primer?

    i can't really think of any benefits to having a titanium striker, other than durability, but if strikers are breaking, there are other problems.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    WY
    Posts
    887
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I have to ask....

    Why?

    Ti striker: NOT more durable, but in fact more brittle.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,545
    Feedback Score
    45 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by M4Guru View Post
    Why?
    The $10 million question.
    Only hits count......you can not miss fast enough to catch up

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    PA
    Posts
    220
    Feedback Score
    24 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by M4Guru View Post
    I have to ask....

    Why?

    Ti striker: NOT more durable, but in fact more brittle.
    I know when trying to "make weight" for USPSA production class guys will change out all of the small parts for Ti to help offset the sights, grip tape, recoil rod, ect.
    I know some have been tricked into believing "faster lock time" or other such nonsense , and they claim the Ti plunger is lighter so that lightens the pull up when your on the hunt for the 1lb GLOCK trigger it all adds up.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    3,737
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by SWATcop556 View Post
    The $10 million question.
    Not $10 million, but $94.99

    Lighter means faster strike, resulting in a faster shot and accuracy. At least that is the theory, therefore thought I would test.


    Check out the video (1st two minutes or so):

    http://glockstore.com/pgroup_descrip...h_val%3Dls002s
    Last edited by platoonDaddy; 06-27-12 at 20:19.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    11
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    snake oil, IMHO.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,918
    Feedback Score
    22 (100%)
    Its also lighter meaning the chances of a light primer strike are higher.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Topeka, KS
    Posts
    1,583
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    These batter rather quickly and tend to get spots that peen badly.

    My advice is to go back to the factory striker immediately.

    As has been said, Ti Glock strikers are snake oil.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    53
    Feedback Score
    0
    The faster lock time would help in bench-rest rifles and in shooting at long range but at handgun ranges any increase in accuracy would be negligable (likely, not even detectable) even for the best pistol shooters.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •