
Originally Posted by
S-1
Yes, all SIGs are crap. We all know that Glocks and M&P's have never encountered QC issues (especially when everyone is pumping out record amounts of guns), never have parts breakage nor do they ever malfunction.

I only bought 2 Glocks last year, a G26 and a G20 and I already had an M&P.357sig. They all run great. Then I buy my first Sig @ $1200 and it doesn't function and then breaks. Imagine my displeasure after talking up Sigs for so long based on their track record. Then I have two more brand new Sigs fail on me. The fourth a cheap P250 ran fine but after the issues from the others I finally gave up.
I can accept the thought that the more guns that are made will obviously have more complaints. Especially, on the internet but when I spend $3500 in guns and $3k of them fail on me and have to go back, I'd say that's more than bad luck. That's straight Evil.
I'm the type of person who only likes the best. ...Or at least the best that I can afford. I was told for as long as I can remember the Sig was one of the best. I just wish my examples of their products showed me that type of value. I really loved my TacOps.
Could I just be the most unlucky customer in the world? Maybe, but that's the way it is.
Directly to the OP and his issue, send it back to Sig. Send it back as many times as it takes till you either get tired of it or you pay a good Gunsmith to figure out the problem.
In celebration of Ramadan, I'll be eating Pork all month. You're Welcome.
Bookmarks