Thanks for the input. Im heavily leaning TR24 and hope I don't have that issue. How is the FC2 reticle at speed? Had the NP1 and didn't like it.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thanks for the input. Im heavily leaning TR24 and hope I don't have that issue. How is the FC2 reticle at speed? Had the NP1 and didn't like it.
"Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day."
Thomas Jefferson
I think it's great. I haven't tried shooting back-to-back with it vs. an Aimpoint while timing myself, but shooting matches with a lot of close targets I don't feel like I'm giving up much, if anything, with the FC2. For the super close targets I generally just sight down the handguard and never really used my Aimpoint or the NF. For the targets that are a little further out, or ones where you have to make a tight shot, I don't really think it's significantly slower to line up the reticle on a good scope at 1x than it is to line up the Aimpoint's dot.
I run a Burris XTR, the Leupold 1-6 is about twice the price, but if I had the budget is what I would have opted to get.
-Thomas
Member, ISRA; Life Member, NRA; USCCA Certified Instructor; NRA Certified Instructor, AGI Certified Gunsmith, Illinois Concealed Carry Instructor
www.alphakoncepts.com www.gunrights4illinois.com
Who is carrying the new Leupy?
"Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day."
Thomas Jefferson
I just ordered the US Optics dfp. I put a few rounds through a gun equipped with one. While my time was limited I really liked it. With some practice, I feel I could be as proficient as I am with my T1 at close range. I'll give a report when mine comes in and I get some time behind it.
This thread is chock full of info:
https://www.m4carbine.net/showthread.php?t=104
I've been using the 1-4 DFP for a while now. As far as 1-4 optics go, I think it shows a lot of promise.
I'm still in the testing phase, so I'm not going to get into the pros/cons, likes/dislikes. I will go so far as to say that I like it more than most other 1-4s, and that my criticisms are more based on personal preference than overall performance.
More to come later.
Typos brought to you via Tapatalk and autocorrect.
This is getting harder and harder. I'm wondering if the USO is just too much. I'm looking to have a simple uncluttered ret and feel the USO might be like having a smart phone when all you want to do is make phone calls. Am I wrong here. I just want practical accuracy and I'm not looking to shoot groups or shoot over 300 yds.
Last edited by newyork; 08-14-12 at 17:34.
"Enlighten the people generally, and tyranny and oppressions of body and mind will vanish like evil spirits at the dawn of day."
Thomas Jefferson
I have been running my Trji TR24G for just about 3 years now. I snagged one as soon as they hit the shelves.
I think it is an ideal 0-200yd optic. Out past 250-300yds things get a little sketchy but as long as you know your holds it is plenty useable. I run a 100yd zero on mine and I have used it @ 600yds and get consistent hits on a fullsize IPSC steel target all day long.
The eye relief is outstanding on 1x and both eyes open CQB shooting is super fast with the giant green triangle. On the shot timer I am faster with my TR24G than I am with my Eotech EXPS and I have far more time behind an Eotech.
"The future's uncertain, and the end is always near." Jim Morrison
"Fortuitous outcomes reinforce poor training and tactics"
Nick,
Have you experienced any of the moisture related issues above? Do you / have you used the optic in rainy conditions?
Matthew 10:28
Bookmarks