If only...! It's more like 6, these days. They've gotten two waivers for the accuracy spec, one for primers, IOT keep up with production at the height of festivities. As the spool-down happens....given M855A1, there's no reason for them to tighten it up again....unless we hear the popping noise of somebody's head being pulled from their ass, once they realize how many guns they're breaking with that overpressured go-green crap.
Unsurprisingly, I'm with a0: If one is prepared to buy a SS barrel, then buy the amount of good ammo and range time it takes to slug the thing, one is posessed of the money to replace said SS barrel, regardless of what round-count it takes to slug the thing. "How many...?" is kind of a moot question, in the face of all the other logistical ones that need be answered.....or is at least one that can by answered by saying "As many as it takes!"
Yeah, they're gonna wear somewhat faster, but it's no easy thing to pin a number to it.
If it's "I wants a sooper-dooper akkerate barrel derp derp!" when buying Wolf, Remington UMC, PMC and the like.....an SS barrel is lost on those poor brainless souls, but it IS a free-market economy. Fools are parted from their money every day.
If 3MOA is one's chosen spec, just say 3MOA. I'll be kind and assert that "combat accurate" is a meaningless phrase, on a par with nonsensical verbal diarrhea like "knockdown power." Accuracy/precision isn't based upon an event, otherwise we'd be able to define a "Debutante Cotillion-Accurate" weapon or an "Arbor Day-Accurate" weapon, and that's a world I don't want to live in.



Reply With Quote
), but my question for you guys is unrelated to that. I'm more concerned with the barrel's longevity as a measure of its ability to continue being combat accurate. From my perspective, that's 3 MOA with quality ammo, though I'd be lying if I said I actually had any experience to tell me if 3 MOA is truly adequate in a combat scenario or not.


Bookmarks