Page 2 of 19 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 181

Thread: Gotta keep them ARs clean

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    ROCKET CITY, USA
    Posts
    3,228
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Speaking as "an old Marine"...
    I can say without hesitatation that almost EVERYTHING we were taught back then, in the early eighties in my case, was wrong.
    The absolute overcleaning & scrubbing, the MANDATORY 3 day cleaning after firing, using those horrid steel buttstock cleaning rods over and over and over, my God, how those rifles were able to hit a damn thing is simply amazing.
    But, then, it was the most up-to-date, state of the art info we had.
    Now you take those guys, who after the Corps, NEVER had any further training or learned anything else after they got out, cause you know, they were MARINES by God, and we know everything, and anything else besides what I just described is heresy.
    THE most sorry assed, dangerous gun handling Ive ever seen was while I was in the Corps.
    I wonder, do they still insist on the white glove cleanliness and 3 day cleaning regimine after firing?

  2. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    3,095
    Feedback Score
    7 (89%)
    Quote Originally Posted by Straight Shooter View Post
    Speaking as "an old Marine"...
    I can say without hesitatation that almost EVERYTHING we were taught back then, in the early eighties in my case, was wrong.
    The absolute overcleaning & scrubbing, the MANDATORY 3 day cleaning after firing, using those horrid steel buttstock cleaning rods over and over and over, my God, how those rifles were able to hit a damn thing is simply amazing.
    But, then, it was the most up-to-date, state of the art info we had.
    Now you take those guys, who after the Corps, NEVER had any further training or learned anything else after they got out, cause you know, they were MARINES by God, and we know everything, and anything else besides what I just described is heresy.
    THE most sorry assed, dangerous gun handling Ive ever seen was while I was in the Corps.
    I wonder, do they still insist on the white glove cleanliness and 3 day cleaning regimine after firing?
    My friend in the Army still does to this day.
    Quote Originally Posted by C4IGrant View Post
    Colt builds War Horses, not show ponies.
    Quote Originally Posted by Iraqgunz View Post
    This is 2012. The world is going to end this December and people are still trying to debate the merits of piece of shit, cost cutting crap AR's. Really?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    North Florida
    Posts
    2,679
    Feedback Score
    1 (100%)
    I had forgotten, I ran maybe 10K rounds of 22 long rifle with this lower. 22 long rifle is dirty, dirty, dirty.

    I did not put the extra power hammer spring in the lower. I have the occasional failure to go bang which I use as malfunction clearance practice. I also have a couple of jammamatic magazines I use for the same purpose.

    I don't know if an extra power hammer spring would cause problems with conventional center fire ammo. I would not use it with 22 long rifle.
    Last edited by Suwannee Tim; 09-08-12 at 07:42.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    VA
    Posts
    7,469
    Feedback Score
    12 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by ryr8828 View Post
    If I remember right I've got an wolfe extra power hammer spring in my lower that's coupled with my 5.45 upper so I don't change uppers out. Was afraid it would cause a problem. Am I wrong?
    You'll be fine.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    E. Tennessee
    Posts
    2,124
    Feedback Score
    6 (100%)
    Quote Originally Posted by fallenromeo View Post
    I think BCM would disagree with you about keeping the AR squeaky clean.
    Pretty sure Tim was being sarcastic dude.
    ETC (SW/AW), USN (1998-2008)
    CVN-65, USS Enterprise

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,505
    Feedback Score
    3 (100%)
    This was not only a MC problem. On one occasion, because of an anal armorer, all us flunkies took our ARs in the shower and scrubbed till every microbe was defeated. They were stored bone dry.

    I think much of this came from the 'last war' when corrosive primers were used and a clean rifle was the definition of a 'right soldier/Marine'. Things tend to stick around longer than they need to.

    Then there were problems with the M16 and its use/misuse in the early days of VN.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    ROCKET CITY, USA
    Posts
    3,228
    Feedback Score
    2 (100%)
    Oh yeah..Ive showered with Ole Faithful more than once...I had forgotten about that!!
    Your right m4brian....I know it was service wide. And...I too believe it was just a holdover from a bygone era from blackpowder right up to
    corrosive powders/primers.
    As always, the military are the LAST to change their ways, usually kicking and screaming.
    As weapons/ammo/techniques/technology have evolved, so has weapons maintenance. I qarauntee a boresnake back in the 70's & 80's would have been laughed out og the barracks. I oft wonder, if 20-25 years from now, where we'll be and what we will have, and if we will look back to NOW and say the same thing about us, as we do about them back then.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,476
    Feedback Score
    0
    Nevermind.
    Last edited by Arctic1; 09-08-12 at 11:41.
    It's not about surviving, it's about winning!

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    whoring myself to an NFA examiner
    Posts
    859
    Feedback Score
    8 (100%)


    It's great that the weapon system can run like this, but sensable cleaning ( note I said sensable is always a good idea if you have the downtime. It really doesnt take that long to once over a weapon.......
    http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRQ2zEv1ukzyH_aeFG6-amwPk7CUBz7b4URcTQ8lFFl-LOLSDkQ

    "BRD, much like the Wutang clan, is nothing to f@ck with"

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    1,476
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have a few things I would like to comment on. I know that "the one and only way" is defined, so what I say probably won't matter, but I think people need some perspective on this "no cleaning" thing.

    1. Weapons do not need to be white glove clean to function. Everybody knows this. The whole point of cleaning the gun, ie wiping down the parts, it to facilitate proper parts inspection, not making it spotless.

    In addition, gunpowder residue build up will absorb moisture, and can lead to corrosion/rust. This of course depends on materials used, coatings etc.

    2. Lube

    "Didn't you hear, lube attracts sand and dust."

    Well, actually it does. Not a huge problem with assault or battle rifles, seeing as they are mostly closed systems, but it is an issue with crew served weapons, where sand and dust can and will get into the feeding mechanism of the gun.

    This is why we try and limit the amount of lube on the outside of the gun, whilst running it sufficiently lubed on the inside.

    Dry guns will be coated with sand and dust as well, but doesn't gum up like the areas with lube do. Still, wet sand glides better than dry sand.

    The main culprit in regards to foreign debris inside the receiver, are magazines; sand, rocks and dirt gets into the pouches when people are shooting from the prone, low crawling etc, and gets into the gun via the mag. Depending on the amount and size, this can cause some serious issues.

    3. "The military way is retarded, and soldiers don't know what they are doing"

    This is a common theme, and somewhat understandable. There is no doubt that the "white glove clean" approach to weapons maintenance lost it's original intent somewhere along the way.

    I am not going to claim that I know where it happened, or why, but I am pretty sure that the "clean rifle" approach was initially a result of one thing:

    An easy standard to enforce across the board to ensure that everybody maintained their weapons.

    It was not something that was implemented from a lack of knowledge.

    In the military you have studs, duds and everything in between. To enforce a standard that states "no need to clean you guns, just put lube on it", is difficult and problematic. How can you, as a leader, tell if a gun is in working order when doing inspections? How can you tell if the soldier has actually lubed his gun? Is it just the old lube still on there?

    Somewhere along the way, the original intent was lost in translation; everyone who has been in the military and done message/comunication drills when marching single file, knows that the message delivered to the first guy is not the same message repeated by the last guy.

    This phenomenon is pretty common in the military, unfortunatly, where proper knowledge of intent/cause/reason of why something is done a specific way is substituted by "hearsay knowledge"; after a while this "knowledge" becomes a de facto truth, and no one can no longer recall the original intent/cause/reason.

    That is why soldiers are now judged on the cleanliness of their guns, and use retarded methods to get them spotless; their instructors was taught by their instructors, who in turn was taught by their instructors and the message was scrambled along the way.

    I'll end with this Gunfighter Moment, by Larry Vickers:

    Gunfighter Moment – Larry Vickers

    “Attention to detail; in the world of combat marksmanship there is absolutely no substitute for attention to detail. Simple things like proper maintanence can literally mean success or failure in a gunfight.”

    -Larry Vickers
    MSG, US Army (Ret)
    http://soldiersystems.net/2012/09/01...rry-vickers-3/
    Last edited by Arctic1; 09-08-12 at 13:12.
    It's not about surviving, it's about winning!

Page 2 of 19 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •