
Originally Posted by
misanthropist
A well set-up gun with a roll-mark that doesn't impress me would generate a much more favourable response than a Colt with a grip-pod, a bushnell trophy 3-9 and a CAA stock.

Originally Posted by
MistWolf

Originally Posted by
wahoo95
I hate it when I try to generate a mental image of whatever impossibly stupid thing I can think of, and then within 24 hours, I start seeing pictures of it on the internet.
**** you, human race.
Anyway I think it's really interesting that people are drawing parallels between roll marks on ARs, which for whatever reason aren't allowed to be skulls or pirates or spiders, and logos on hammers, which, if they're skulls, are badass. Also the fetishizing of desaturated shades of grey, green and brown.
I mean obviously a rifle with a horse on it is likely to be built better than a rifle with a snake on it...but a home build of DD parts in a zombie or spider lower could be just a good.
I'm fine with people saying "that zombie shit is gay", of course...provided they aren't the same people who go all squirrelly when their new accessory in Flat Dark Earth looks a little too Coyote Brown, and doesn't match their other FDE stuff now.
There's a lot of ways to be a tac homo.
Full disclosure: I'm the editor of Calibre Magazine, which is Canada's gun magazine. In the past I've done consulting work for different manufacturers and OEM suppliers, but not currently. M4C's disclosure policy doesn't seem to cover me but we do have advertisers, although I don't handle that side of things and in general I do not know who is paying us at any given time.
Bookmarks