I'm a big DTA fan who owns a SRS and got to shoot a HTI prototype at Ft. Benning last year. The company makes an excellent product that is accurate and durable. Having said that, I was a much bigger fan before DTA raised their prices by $1K on the SRS about 15 months ago. Luckily, I got one of the last origional productions without the monopod and before the price hike.
Honestly, this is a rather expensive rifle for what you get at $4.6K for the chassis and $2.4K for each caliber kit. It is $2K more than a Barrett M95 which is a little longer but lighter. I'm not sure that the value is as apparent for this rifle given that most people are going to be shooting exclusively 1 caliber (probably 50 BMG). That is to say, I frequently switch calibers between 308 and 338 on my SRS to shoot a less expensive round and get better with my range and wind estimations (308 is much less forgiving). I'm less likely to be switching between HTI calibers since there is no real cost savings.
I suppose that an arguement could be made for the HTI being a dual use rifle - 375CH for precision and 50 BMG for anti-material. However, you are now talking about $10K for both conversions and the chassis. Personally, I'd rather have the new M107A1 if I'm going to spend that kind of coin.
Last edited by Sensei; 10-26-12 at 01:51.
I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.
Bookmarks