I've got one set up in the Larue 1.93 tall mount.
I use mine on duty/SWAT the taller version is great for a more heads up moving type of shooting.
If your more a bench shooter I would go for the standard height either the Bobro, Larue, or ADM.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I've got one set up in the Larue 1.93 tall mount.
I use mine on duty/SWAT the taller version is great for a more heads up moving type of shooting.
If your more a bench shooter I would go for the standard height either the Bobro, Larue, or ADM.
I have two TR24 in standard LaRue mounts, I forget the model number. It doesn't have extra eye relief.
I don't need any additional eye relief probably because I don't hold nose to charging handle.
I move one with the German style cross hairs to a deer rifle (with classic ring mounts) in the fall. The other is green triangle on post, a very fast handling optic for shooting pigs.
TR24 is good glass for the price and the green dot or triangle makes it easy on my older eyesight.
RFA
Last edited by Ready.Fire.Aim; 11-13-12 at 17:41.
Pretty far forward from what I've seen, but workable. I mean, you can scoot the scope back a bit, but the regular recon mount provides the right amount of eye relief off the bat.
At 1X, the TR24 is very forgiving about eye relief and the eye box. At 4X though, it's a bit pickier and I would think the Recon-X mount is too far forward.
A Matech folding sight will just fit under a TR-24 in a Bobro mount with the scope even with the end of the charging handle. It's a tight fit, though.
I just mounted a TR24 on a customer's 6920 today in an ADM Recon-H.
I tried the Recon-20moa mount but at 1x power the front sight base took up too much field of view in the optic (even at 1x the FSB is magnified, unlike when seen through true red dot optic.).
With the Recon-H, you see just a little bit of the front sight at 1x, but it disappears at about 1.5x and up. The Recon-H gives more of a heads-up (or chin weld vs. cheek weld) positioning.
Bookmarks