Correct me if I'm wrong, and there's a pretty good chance of that. It seems to me that for the layman, we are really only concerned about the depth of penetration and the size of the expanded projectile, if expansion occurs. We already know, in a general way, how various projectiles interact with tissue based on earlier professional gelatin tests. If a series of tests done with one of the newfangled gels shows performance relatively consistent with 10% ordnance gelatin, wouldn't that indicate that future tests should be similar? What I mean is that it seems like those gels are *close* even if they aren't exactly the same and *close* is probably good enough for most of us, right?