Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: New .308 Sig Match ammo

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Rochester N.Y.
    Posts
    168
    Feedback Score
    0

    New .308 Sig Match ammo

    Trying to figure this out I have shot a lot of .308 Match Federal and Hornady as well as Military. When I look at the numbers on Sigs new 308 match shooting a Sierra 168 grain bthp bullet according to the charts on their web page. It tells me it will have a velocity of 1805 fps as well as a 1215 foot pounds of energy at 600 yards. while Hornandy Only has 933 ft pounds and 1582 fps velocity at the same range. While they only have a 100 fps difference in velocity at the muzzle. Maybe my PhD ( Plain High School Diploma is failing me but that is just hard to reason out. Anybody shot this yet to confirm?
    Last edited by SGTMAJ; 08-04-16 at 13:15.
    I am the military products manager for Lasermax

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Rochester N.Y.
    Posts
    168
    Feedback Score
    0

    This is the data Im talking about 600 at the 600y numbers

    Came across this the other day about the new Sig arms Match ammo in .308 and 300WM. Dont know about the math at 600 yards compared to Hornandy or Federal all are using 168Gr bullets. This is for .308 from the sig web site.

    The Federal and Sig are said to use 168gr Sierra 168gr bthp match king bullets.

    Velocity fps
    Muzzle 200 yds 400yds 600yds
    2700 2318 1967 1805 Sig Match
    2600 2240 1910 1610 Federal Match
    2600 2226 1885 1582 Hornandy

    Energy in Ft pounds
    2719 2003 1443 1216 Sig
    2530 1870 1355 970 Federal
    2522 1848 1326 933 Hornandy

    Trajectory in inches from 100yd zero
    100y 200y 400y 600y
    0 -4.1 -32.8 -59.9 Sig
    0 -4.5 -35.5 -105 Federal
    0 -4.5 -35.9 -106.8 Hornandy

    The performance looks out of sink with the other 2 competitors.
    Or maybe this stuff is that good? Anybody shot it yet or got any ideas on why the math is so much better for the Sig ammo?
    I am the military products manager for Lasermax

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Montana
    Posts
    110
    Feedback Score
    0
    I have not shot the ammo, or ran any numbers. I'm betting that Sig used a different input in their ballistic program, whether that be atmosphere, or BC or something and it spit out different numbers to put on their boxes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Rochester N.Y.
    Posts
    168
    Feedback Score
    0
    Yea makes me wonder if the ammo is any good if they cant even get their ballistic tables right? Also why go 168s when most people are shooting heavier bullets?
    I am the military products manager for Lasermax

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    AZ
    Posts
    8,431
    Feedback Score
    9 (100%)
    They may have shot theirs from top of Mt Everest. Lotta ways to get there. I would just shoot it and decide if its worth a darn or not. It has be a better price than Federal, literally the GOLD STANDARD for many folks for factory fodder, and needs to be just as accurate.

    PB
    Last edited by Pappabear; 08-10-16 at 10:18.
    "Air Force / Policeman / Fireman / Man of God / Friend of mine / R.I.P. Steve Lamy"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Rockledge, FL
    Posts
    425
    Feedback Score
    13 (100%)
    Local shop has it for 35 a box. No thanks when i can fgmm for 20 ish and recently I found my gun likes ADI and its 19 a box

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •