New Stabilizing Brace for AR15 Pistol "SB15"

**DTakas** · 07-24-13, 14:43

- - - - -

**Krull** · 07-24-13, 17:40

Originally Posted by Moltke

I think this is one and the same.

Wouldn't surprise me.

Whatever the case may be I'll just stay away from this as no telling when the ATF may change their minds over just what this is.....they do that fairly regular.

**WickedWillis** · 07-24-13, 17:48

This post was running before sig announced the one's they are working on.

Originally Posted by bobsolla

doesn`t sig already offer a very similar product already?this just appears to be a copy!

**Damon1976** · 08-12-13, 16:28

i used 1 this weekend. my buddy put 1 on his noveske build. this thing is 100% legit and i ordered 1 for my DD 300blk upper. you pair this thing with a law tactical folder and you are golden

**Tzook** · 08-19-13, 23:34

Originally Posted by Damon1976

i used 1 this weekend. my buddy put 1 on his noveske build. this thing is 100% legit and i ordered 1 for my DD 300blk upper. you pair this thing with a law tactical folder and you are golden

That right there is a great idea.

**steyrman13** · 08-19-13, 23:45

Originally Posted by WickedWillis

This post was running before sig announced the one's they are working on.

The ATF letter that Sig has to print off to go with their pistol is the same letter that he posted, so I would imagine he licensed it to sig.

**Damon1976** · 08-19-13, 23:50

Originally Posted by DTakas

I think this thing, especially the second version, is asking for trouble. I’m all for helping disabled vets, and if someone has a disability or mobility issue with one arm or hand I can see this having a legitimate use. But it really looks like your goal here is to skirt the law which is obviously not going to be met with a lot of support from members, like me, of the general firearms community that are trying so hard to prove we are responsible law abiding members of a society that is out to demonize us.

Personally think you should have gone out of your way to make sure it could not be used as a stock. I think it would have been more effective to make a soft cuff with a semi-rigid ring on top that would stay on the shooter's arm and could be slipped over the buffer tube from the back as the gun is picked up and could be slid back off the buffer tube as the gun is let go of. I think that is much more practical for someone with a disability than the concept of semi-permanently strapping their only good hand onto the gun. How is a disabled person supposed to do a one handed reload when their only good hand is strapped to the buffer tube?

my friend you are thinking WAY too much. your first thought was exactly right. no one is suppose to use this thing 1 handed, you simply cant. this is exactly what it looks like. a butstock. end of story. i personally went out of my way to get 1 for no other reason than you can use it as a stock, to "skirt"the law as you so put it. because as a responsible gun owner like yourself i feel it is my duty to follow the letter of the law as the atf so states it. and if they say this arm brace, which works perfectly as a butstock, is legal then by george ill take 3

**Mr.Anderson** · 08-20-13, 05:36

Would there be an issue if the BATF saw someone using the "brace" like a stock?

Or, if you were on video and someone wanted to ruin your day?

I think the whole SBR/Suppressed laws are a bunch of bull butter.
Unfortunately, my opinion of them don't change a thing.
So, I gotta keep it "legal".