THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST etc![]()
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST THE COST etc![]()
"After I shot myself, my training took over and I called my parents..." Texas Grebner
"Take me with a grain of salt, my sarcasm does not relate well over the internet"
Jonathan Morehouse
For all the user sets you've listed, cost dictates is. For most of the advantages the KAC system offers, you can still just burn right through the mil-spec expendable parts in their place (E3 bolt) and still be money ahead, especially considering the primary cost is ammunition anyway. The added features are great (I have two as well), but for most organizations that cost up front isn't as attractive as most of the other options that do use standard parts all the way across the board, and KAC is still doing significant business anyway and don't need to hemorrhage cash to promote civilian SR-15's anywya.
عندما تصبح الأسلحة محظورة, قد يملكون حظرون عندهم فقط
کله چی سلاح منع شوی دی، یوازي غلوونکۍ یی به درلود
Semper Fi
"Being able to do the basics, on demand, takes practice. " - Sinister
US Department of Defense is the main customer of KAC. The SR-25 is commonly used by special forces. They are expensive and made more for special operations, rather than a standard issue for every single grunt. In my opinion, the best two names in 'combat' firearms would be Knights Armament and Heckler & Koch. Not really even opinion; FACT
Got to be cost, take a BCM, DD or Colt add a couple pieces and a consumer has a great rifle. I would personally love to have a KAC rifle but the cost compared to other tier 1 rifles is high, plain and simple.
I have an sr15 on order that I hope to run the piss out of this year.
In my opinion the price throws people off, understandable but honestly if you want play you to pay.
You posted this same question on TOS. Is there a reason you are posting the same question everwhere?
Bookmarks